Ryzen 7 vs i7 – Introduction

Ryzen 7 vs i7 – The debate between AMD vs Intel CPUs has been going on for decades. In the last several years, AMD has made huge strides with their Ryzen processor line, bringing core counts and performance up considerably compared to their previous AMD FX CPUs. The Ryzen 7 series aimed directly at competing with Intel’s enthusiast-class i7 processors.

the differences between Ryzen 7 vs i7  across a variety of factors like manufacturing process, CPU cores, cache, clock speeds, graphics, overclocking, power efficiency, pricing, performance benchmarks, and real-world use case recommendations. You may be surprised at just how competitive Ryzen has gotten!

Ryzen 7 vs i7 - Hasons

Manufacturing Process

Ryzen 7 :- One key innovation that allowed AMD to achieve much greater performance with Ryzen is the move to a smaller, more efficient CPU manufacturing process. Intel had been stuck on iteratively improving their 14nm node for years now while AMD took the risk to jump to an advanced 7nm process with Ryzen 3000 series, achieved through a technology sharing partnership with TSMC.

The 7nm process allows for greater transistor density and efficiency. When combined with the “chiplet” design on Ryzen where IO, memory controllers, and cores are split into a separate dies, AMD can achieve incredible core counts within reasonable thermal envelopes. The 7nm process is also instrumental to the IPC (instructions per clock) gains Ryzen has made.

i7:- Intel is finally moving to 10nm for their newly launched 10th-generation Core i7 line, using their own in-house manufacturing. However, yields are reportedly not yet optimal. Intel’s monolithic design is also harder to scale for high core counts without efficiency losses. AMD already has their next-gen Ryzen 4000 series sampling on an enhanced 7nm+ process, driving clock speeds even higher.

Desktop Computer - Hasonsi7 12th gen Desktop | Motherboard H610 | 8GB RAM | 512 SSD | 21.5 Inch screen | Keyboard and Mouse
Call 9766122859 to place an offline order and receive FLAT 500/- DISCOUNT

RS. 52,200.00 Shop Now

CPU Cores and Threads – Ryzen 7 vs i7

  • Core counts are one area where Ryzen has a dominant position over Intel at the moment. Current 3rd-gen Ryzen 7 processors offer up to 16 cores and 32 threads, such as with the flagship Ryzen 9 3950X. The Intel i7 lineup tops out at 8 cores and 16 threads.
  • With workloads continuing to scale upwards in parallelization, especially for content creation, having more cores and threads is a huge advantage. Even for gaming, we are starting to see titles take better advantage of high thread counts thanks to new consoles featuring 8-core Zen 2 CPUs.

Clock Speeds

  • Out-of-the-box clock speeds look very different on paper between the product lines. The Intel Core i7-10700K peaks at an impressive 5.1 GHz turbo out of the box, compared to 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3800XT. However, when comparing instructions executed per clock cycle (IPC), Ryzen 3000 has closed the gap significantly.
  • We’ll dive deeper into actual benchmarks later, but in real-world usage, that clock speed difference does not directly translate to a performance difference as great as it may seem. With Ryzen 4000 pushing clocks even higher on 7nm+, achieving Intel’s gaming dominance is firmly within reach for AMD.


  • Larger cache pools on processors help to substantially reduce memory access latency. Data needed by the CPU cores can be stored locally, avoiding the need to interface with slower DRAM as frequently. When looking at cache, Ryzen 3000 and Intel 10th gen Core i7 products have similarly sized L1 and L2 caches per core.
  • However, Intel still maintains an advantage in L3 cache. The 10900K ships with 16 MB of L3 compared to 64MB on the 3800X. This does translate to real-world performance benefits in many workloads, especially gaming. In the future, expect AMD’s “Zen 4” to significantly improve cache size parity with Intel.

Integrated Graphics

  • Nearly all Ryzen 7 processors feature pretty decent integrated Vega graphics on-die, with up to 20 compute units on the higher-end parts. With Intel, you only find integrated graphics on the “F-series” SKUs, using lower-performance Intel UHD graphics. Plus, AMD allows overclocking of iGPUs, whereas Intel locks multipliers.
  • Having capable integrated graphics is a huge factor for builders of budget systems without a discrete GPU or compact small form factor setups. It also aids overall platform power efficiency to avoid needing dedicated graphics chips for non-gaming server-style workloads. Intel is improving in this area with their new Xe graphics coming soon, but AMD maintains the advantage.

Overclocking Potential

  • Both platforms enable users to overclock for extra performance with the proper motherboard and cooling. For Intel Core i7, you’ll need to opt for the “K-series” unlocked SKUs to overclock. This includes options like the 10700K and 10900K. When paired with a Z490 or Z390 chipset motherboard, users can run these processors well over 5 GHz across all cores with proper tuning.
  • For Ryzen overclocking, all processors outside of non-Gsuffixed models are unlocked out of the box. Using a B450/X470/X570 AMD motherboard, typical safe 24/7 overclocks in the 4.3-4.5 GHz range are achievable, especially for earlier Zen+ based Ryzen 2000 chips. More aggressive overclockers can push even higher using exotic cooling methods. Overall, both platforms provide ample headroom.

Power Efficiency

  • Historically, Intel has offered superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to AMD. The 14nm process allowed Intel to refine efficiency over several generations. However, AMD has again significantly closed the gap with Zen 2 based Ryzen 3000 series.
  • Comparing something like the Ryzen 7 3700X to Core i7-9700K, the 3700X manages similar multi-core performance at only 65 watts, versus the 95 watt 9700K. This better efficiency comes despite AMD’s process disadvantage. When Zen 3 arrives on the next-gen 5nm process, efficiency should pull ahead of Intel measurably for the first time.

Benchmarks and Performance – Ryzen 7 vs i7

Now that we’ve compared the architectural details, let’s dive into real-world benchmarks from both synthetic and gaming tests. We’ll be pulling data from sources like Anandtech, Tom’s Hardware, Techspot, and other trusted publications testing with mature motherboard BIOS revisions at play.

1. Productivity and Content Creation Benchmarks

For productivity, content creation, rendering and encoding workloads that can take advantage of higher core/thread counts, Ryzen 7 dominates Intel Core i7 universally. Apps like Blender, Handbrake, After Effects, Premiere, MATLAB, Visual Studio compilation, 7-zip compression, Veracrypt encryption all heavily prefer Ryzen.

The Ryzen 9 3950X beats even Intel’s high-end Core i9-10980XE in almost all of these tests. Intel’s strengths in some areas like memory latency, cache and clock speeds simply does not outweigh 2X the multi-threaded power in most scenarios where software can use it. If your work depends on heavy compiling, number crunching or media processing, Ryzen 7 is undoubtedly the superior choice over any Intel i7 chip.

2. 1080p Gaming Benchmarks

Pure gaming performance paints a different picture. Here Intel still maintains an overall lead, even if AMD has closed the gap further. Comparing something like the Ryzen 7 3800X against the Intel i7-10700K shows strong Intel leads in many titles at 1080p when paired with an Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti or RX 5700 XT.

However, there are plenty of games showing much closer parity or a Ryzen advantage like Assassin’s Creed Odyssey and Borderlands 3. High refresh rate 1080p gamers wanting to squeeze out max frame rates will still likely lean towards Intel. But the differences matter far less at higher resolutions, and for 60 FPS gaming, Ryzen is highly competitive.

3. 1440p and 4K Gaming

At 1440p, things get very interesting. The GPU becomes more of the bottleneck and game engines rely less on raw CPU throughput. Now the faster 8-core Intel chips lose their advantage. Looking at Hardware Unboxed’s recent 1440p 20-game roundup, the $329 Ryzen 7 3700X essentially ties the more expensive overclocked 10700K overall, even slightly winning in 1% low-performance metrics.

The same trend continues at 4K resolution where virtually no difference exists any longer between these processors. Those using higher-resolution gaming monitors can certainly benefit from cheaper Ryzen options over Intel and see no meaningful difference in most titles. Esports gaming still leans Intel, but the differences are smaller than most think.</span></span></span>

Ryzen 7 vs i7 – Pricing and Value

Pound for pound, Ryzen 7 processors offer far better performance-per-dollar value over Intel i7 chips. The Ryzen 7 3700X with 8 cores retail for $329, while the very comparable 10700K is priced at 30000. Bumping up to the 3900X gets you 12 cores for $499 over Intel’s 8 core 9700K also at 35000

When you factor in potentially cheaper B450/X470 motherboard pricing for many Ryzen parts, that value proposition holds up even more firmly. If you rely heavily on multi-threaded performance, the Ryzen 7 gives you dramatically better efficiency per dollar spent. Intel still carries a moderate premium for peak gaming frame rates.

Use Cases and Recommendations

Given everything we’ve discussed, here is how we view Ryzen 7 and Intel Core i7 recommendations for various common PC build use cases:

  • Budget-focused gaming rigs: Ryzen 5 3600 + B450 motherboard
  • High FPS esports gaming: Core i7-10700K + Z490
  • Workstation productivity: Ryzen 7 3700X + X470
  • Heavy content creation: Ryzen 9 3900X + X570
  • Best performance under 120000: Ryzen 9 3950X + X570
  • Best performance, no compromise: Core i9-10900K + Z490

As you can see, each platform has its advantages aligned towards specific workloads. Ryzen 7 kicks butt for multi-core rendering and computes as an incredible value, while Intel clinging onto the lead for peak gaming speeds today.

Tabular Comparison

Here is also a quick specs comparison table between current gen Ryzen 7 and Intel Core i7 processors at a glance:

Ryzen 7 vs i7 - Hasons


AMD has made enormous progress competing with and even beating Intel with their new Ryzen 3000 desktop processors. For budget buyers, professional content creators, or really anyone relying heavily on parallel performance, ryzen 7 vs i7, Ryzen 7  is a clear slam dunk over similarly priced Intel Core i7 models.

However, ryzen 7 vs i7 Intel isn’t giving up without a fight. They still hold a moderate lead today for high FPS 1080p gaming. And Intel’s 10th gen delivers much improved multi-core speeds over previous generations. Going forward, expect continued exchange of the crown between AMD and Intel as they push to 7nm vs 10nm/7nm designs. One thing is for sure – this revived competitive landscape means great innovation and value for us PC enthusiasts!

Now, understanding this concept is simple and entertaining for Hasons. Using the Hason website you can always stay one step ahead in your job, business, or studies by purchasing New Age Desktops and All in One Desktops, i3 Intel Core Processor Desktop starting from 15000/-. Monitors, CPUs, and Gaming Desktop are also available. Register on Hasons and order your Tech Partner Now. Get exciting offers and benefits on your every purchase. Contact us so our support team can guide you in purchasing the right Tech Partner.

If you are reading Difference Between Primary and Secondary Memory then also check our other blogs:
Computer Virus First Electronic Computer

ryzen 7 vs i7

  • What is better i7 or Ryzen 7?
    For multi-threaded workloads, Ryzen 7 is generally better than Intel i7 thanks to having more cores and threads at every price point. But Intel i7 maintains a slight lead for gaming workloads focused purely on peak frame rates. Overall Ryzen 7 provides better future-proofing and performance per dollar.
  • Is Ryzen 7 better than i7 12th generation?
    The latest 12th gen Intel i7 is more competitive with its hybrid efficiency/performance core design. But similarly priced Ryzen 7000 models like the 7700X still beat the 13600K for rendering, coding and other heavily multi-threaded apps. For pure gaming, Intel retains a small lead. It's very close.
  • Which is better i7 or Ryzen 7 for programming?
    For programming and compilations workloads, Ryzen 7 is considerably better optimized. Having more cores to leverage speeds up code editing and building projects in IDEs like Visual Studio. The extra threads also accelerate VM/container workloads frequently used in programming.
  • Is AMD Ryzen 7 better than Intel i7 for multitasking?
    Absolutely, Ryzen 7 processors excel at heavy multitasking over Intel i7. The abundance of extra cores and threads help Ryzen negotiate multiple demanding apps at once with lower latency. Intel is better optimized purely for single-threaded tasks.
  • What is Ryzen 7 best for?
    Ryzen 7 is best suited for productivity, content creation, development, scientific/engineering applications. Workloads that can scale across many cores favor Ryzen 7 over Intel i7 which focuses more on peak gaming speeds.
  • Is Ryzen 7 cheaper than i7?
    For equivalent core counts, Ryzen 7 CPUs retail for considerably lower prices than Intel i7 models. Part of AMD's competitive strategy with Ryzen is to undercut Intel's pricing while offering greater multi-core performance. So you get much better value going Ryzen 7.


Subscribe my Newsletter for new blog posts, tips & new photos. Let's stay updated!

hasons logo

Contact Information

+91 94038-91340

@ 2023 Hasons. All rights reserved.